ESTATE PLANNING

Published on: December 18, 2009

Longer Life Expectancy Will Present Challenges

Recently several reports have come out predicting that life expectancy is on the increase. Males born in the 1900’s could expect to live into their 60’s. A male born in 2005 can expect to live into his late 70’s. Mac Arthur Research Network on an Aging Society estimates in a recent report that Americans will live longer in the next 40 years. They estimate that women will live to be 89 – 93 on an average by the year 2050 and men 83 – 86 years. Another study which was published in the medical journal Lancet estimates that more than half of babies born since 2000 can expect to live to be over 100 years old.

What implications will these extra few years mean to our society? Longer lives (and presumably healthier) lives will change the traditional cycle of education, employment, and retirement. There will be more older persons living longer which surely will affect health care, health insurance, and medical providers that specialize in elder care. Older workers may need to stay in the work force longer and plan for retirement a little differently. The outlays which will be necessary for Medicare and Social Security could rise by $3.2 million to $8.3 million by 2050. Maybe people won’t want to retire at age 60 – 65 if they still have another 40 years to live. A postponed retirement may affect the types of investments that should be included in your portfolio. It also could affect rules about distributions from retirement accounts, pension plans, and IRA’s.

For estate plans, a longer life expectancy may lengthen the length of the relationship you have with your estate planning attorney and alter the way estate planning is done to address these challenges. The next few decades will be interesting.

Published on: December 13, 2009

Estate Planning Especially Important for Californians with Second Homes

by Scott C. Soady

In many San Diego communities, and especially at the beaches of La Jolla, Del Mar, Cardiff, Encinitas, and Carlsbad, there are people who own a home but make their residence in another state. Or maybe you live here in California and own a second home in Colorado, Oregon, Utah or some other state. Why is estate planning especially important for you?

If you own real estate or even tangible personal property in more than one state, each state will be involved in the distribution of your property upon your death unless you do estate planning. The state where real property or other assets is located has the authority to resolve issues of title to property. So if you make your residence in California but own a timeshare in Hawaii, a timeshare in Florida, and a cabin in Colorado, probate proceedings called ancillary probate will have to be set up in each of those states and in California. Ancillary probate could be necessary if you have cars, boats or airplanes registered in another state or oil, gas, and mineral rights. With the filing of a probate, comes additional costs and probate fees and additional time to conclude each probate.

There are several ways to avoid ancillary probate of property in another state. The best way to transfer title to out of state property upon your death is to have a revocable trust and record each piece of property in the name of your trust. Upon your death, there will be no probate, just the administration of your trust in California, a process that can be accomplished without multiple probates.

Published on: December 5, 2009

Pointers on the Yearly Gift Tax Exemption

by Scott C. Soady

When you give money or property to another person as a gift, you may have to pay a gift tax. The tax is paid by the donor. The person receiving the gift does not have to pay the tax The exemptions for gifts and the gift tax rates are established by the IRS. In 2009 the gift tax exemption threshold is $13,000 meaning that all gifts to one person are not taxable if added together they do not exceed $13,000. Staying under this number means that no gift tax will be due and no gift return has to be filed.

As the holidays and year end approach, many people like to give gifts of money or assets. One important point to remember is that the IRS considers a check to be a gift in the year that it is cashed. Therefore if you are thinking about giving a hefty check to someone for Christmas or some other reason before year end, be sure they cash the check before the end of the year, if you want the amount to count for your 2009 gift tax exemption.

Also remember that the gift exemption is per person so if you are married, you can both give $13,000 to your son, for example, for a total of $26,000. Also you could give a gift to your son in December and then again in January of the following year and as long as your total gift amount does not exceed the exemption amounts for those two years, the gifts would not be subject to gift tax.

Published on: December 1, 2009

House of Representatives to Vote on Death Tax

by Scott C. Soady

The U.S. House of Representatives will vote perhaps as early as this week on legislation to extend the current estate tax rates permanently. Currently the tax rate is 45% of any estates in excess of $3,500,000. As previously discussed in past blogs, $3,500,000 was the tax exemption for 2009. In 2010 there will be no estate tax at all which means that no one will have to pay estate taxes no matter how large their estate is. In 2011, however, without some new legislation, the estate tax will go back to a rate of 55% on assets in excess of $1,000,000. This makes people a little nervous, especially in San Diego where home prices and values are much higher than elsewhere in the country.

All of this stems from the major tax overhaul enacted by President George W. Bush in 2001. Prior to 2001, the top tax rate on inheritances was 55% on estates in excess of $675,000. The law gradually decreased the tax rate and increased the tax exemption amount to the 2009 figures of 45% on estates over $3,500,000.

The bill in the House was introduced by Representative Earl Pomeroy from North Dakota. The bill would make permanent a 45% tax rate on inherited assets in excess of $3,500,000. It is predicted that the bill will pass in the House but whether it has enough support to pass the Senate is debatable. Many people favor a full and permanent repeal of the death tax. If the Senate does not pass the bill by the end of the year, the federal estate tax is scheduled to die for one year only to reappear on estates in excess of $1,000,000 in 2010.

Published on: November 29, 2009

Review Your Guardian Nominations Periodically

by Scott C. Soady

Celebrity deaths often highlight various estate planning issues as prior posts have discussed. Michael Jackson’s death brought public awareness to issues about choosing your executor and trustees, pour over wills, and guardianship. You may recall that Michael Jackson named his mother as guardian of his children. His second choice was Diana Ross. If Michael Jackson’s mother had predeceased him, would he still have wanted Diana Ross to raise his kids, rather than a family member? We’ll never know.

The lesson to be learned is first of all, to name someone you believe will be the right person to raise your children. Do they share your values? Are they stable individuals who will likely be able to provide the necessaries of life? Do they have any medical issues? What if you chose a couple and they get a divorce?

It is important to review your guardian nominations from time to time. As time passes, circumstances and people change. People you choose early in your childrens’ lives may not be the ones you would choose for teenagers. Maybe you named your parent and that parent is now too old to raise your children. Maybe the original guardians have moved away and you want someone local to raise your children. Maybe you have siblings you are close to now and they would be a good choice to raise their nieces and nephews.

Published on: November 25, 2009

What is a Schedule A and Why is it Important?

by Scott C. Soady

Every revocable living trust should have a Schedule A attached to it. This is a document prepared by your estate planning lawyer to list all of the assets that are part of your trust, ie. they have been titled in the name of your trust “John Doe, Trustee of the John Doe Trust.”

There are two important things to keep in mind about your schedule A. First, it is just a summary of your trust assets. What is critical is that assets you want to be in your trust are indeed titled in the name of your trust. Assume for example that you buy a new home and that the deed to your new home lists your trust as the owner but you fail to get out your estate planning binder to add it to your Schedule A. Is the home “in” your trust? Is the home now a “trust asset”despite not being listed on your Schedule A? Yes, because what matters is how the deed is written, not whether you actually wrote it on your Schedule A.

The second important thing to know about a Schedule A is that although it is just a list, that list can in some circumstances assist in avoiding probate. As an example, suppose your Schedule A lists a particular brokerage account that you intended to title in the name of your trust but somehow forgot to mail in the necessary paperwork to make the change. Is the brokerage account “in” your trust (ie. is it a trust asset?) No, because it has not been properly titled in the name of your trust. In California however, if you have an assets listed on your Schedule A and have not transferred that asset by making the title change, you can file a petition called a Heggstad petition to show the court your intent was to transfer the asset into the trust.

Published on: November 12, 2009

The Poor Economy May Be Reason to Amend Your Estate Plan

by Scott C. Soady

With the recent downturn in the economy, San Diego has been one of the hardest hit with declining property values and unemployment. According to the Feds, the states in a full recession are California, Florida, Arizona, and Nevada. California has reached 11%unemployment and San Diego is in the top five cities for decline in property values. Because of these factors, San Diegans may need to review their estate plan and possibly amend their will or trust.

Suppose your trust leaves a cash bequest to a particular beneficiary, maybe a charity, and then divides the rest of your estate into percentages. When the value of your assets goes down, because of lower real property values or a decline in your investments, that in turn will affect the amount other beneficiaries receive as a percentages. As an example suppose an individual decided to leave $100,000 to his favorite charity and the rest of his estate is to be divided between his four children. The trust was done at a time when the rest of his estate had a value of $1 million. With the problems in the economy, now the estate is only worth $700,000. Instead of each child receiving 1/4 of $1 million, they will be receiving 1/4 of $600,000. Since the cash bequest to the charity comes out of estate before the rest of the estate is divided, the children are now going to have a $100,000 per child reduction. Instead of each child inheriting $250,000, they will only inherit $150,000. The trustor may want to rethink the amount of the cash bequest to charity and amend his trust accordingly.

Another example is where you leave one child your trust assets and other children non-trust assets such as an insurance policy. The amount of the life insurance proceeds are not going to change because of the economy but the trust assets very well may. If your goal is to treat all your children equally, then maybe your trust should be amended.

Published on: November 8, 2009

Can You Disinherit Your Spouse?

by Scott C. Soady

Previous posts have discussed how to disinherit your heirs such as a child, sibling, or parent. But what if you want to disinherit your spouse?

Some people may want to disinherit their spouse because they have already provided for him or her elsewhere in their estate plan. Another reason for disinheriting a spouse may be because the spouse has his or her own assets. As an example, suppose a couple marry later in life and each have children from a previous marriage. Neither needs the assets of the other and want to simply provide for their own children. How best to accomplish that?

The best way to disinherit a spouse is by a prenuptial or postnuptial agreement. If spouses sign a waiver and agree to receive nothing or less than the law allows, there is no problem.

Published on: October 24, 2009

Useful Links for Retirement Issues

by Scott C. Soady

In San Diego, there are many people wondering in this economy, when they can retire, when to take social security, how much they need to retire, etc. Social security has predicted that many Americans will live into their 90’s in the years to come and the cost of living will continue to increase so these aspects of retirement also have to be considered.

When to take social security? Although the normal age is 66 years, you can take benefits as early as 62, but your monthly benefit will be reduced. Social security has a table to determine how much it will be reduced. If you take social security early and still continue to work, your benefit will also be reduced for every dollar you earn over $14,160. See the SSA website for a chart on the amount of reduction.

If can be difficult to calculate how much you need to have saved to start retirement. Many people by delaying retirement just for a year or two can increase their annual retirement income by 9 or 10%. There are many on line sites where you can calculate how much you need for retirement. One is on Money Magazine. Another is offered by T. Rowe Price and there are many others. Make sure when you input information, consider that most peple will need at least 70% of their pre-retirement income after they retire. Be sure to add in all sources of income such as a part time job or a second career. Also figure in your projected social security benefits at retirement age.

Published on: October 21, 2009

Estate Planning for the Terminally Ill

by Scott C. Soady

For a person who is terminally ill, obviously time is of the essence. This urgency creates unique estate planning issues. Planning under these circumstances may involve not only the terminally ill individual but also an estate planning lawyer, CPA, financial advisor, and insurance agent. Family members may also need to become involved to assist the person in getting documents together, transporting the client, and assisting in other ways.

Here are some issues that need to be considered:

1. Does the terminally ill client still have mental competency? If the person has capacity at the present time but there is a risk that he or she may lose that capacity, then the planning needs to be done as soon as possible. Another thing to consider is having the individual execute a power of attorney that specifically includes the power to do estate planning so that an agent can make estate planning decisions for the terminally ill person.