LIVING TRUSTS

Published on: November 29, 2009

Review Your Guardian Nominations Periodically

Celebrity deaths often highlight various estate planning issues as prior posts have discussed. Michael Jackson’s death brought public awareness to issues about choosing your executor and trustees, pour over wills, and guardianship. You may recall that Michael Jackson named his mother as guardian of his children. His second choice was Diana Ross. If Michael Jackson’s mother had predeceased him, would he still have wanted Diana Ross to raise his kids, rather than a family member? We’ll never know.

The lesson to be learned is first of all, to name someone you believe will be the right person to raise your children. Do they share your values? Are they stable individuals who will likely be able to provide the necessaries of life? Do they have any medical issues? What if you chose a couple and they get a divorce?

It is important to review your guardian nominations from time to time. As time passes, circumstances and people change. People you choose early in your childrens’ lives may not be the ones you would choose for teenagers. Maybe you named your parent and that parent is now too old to raise your children. Maybe the original guardians have moved away and you want someone local to raise your children. Maybe you have siblings you are close to now and they would be a good choice to raise their nieces and nephews.

Published on: November 25, 2009

What is a Schedule A and Why is it Important?

by Scott C. Soady

Every revocable living trust should have a Schedule A attached to it. This is a document prepared by your estate planning lawyer to list all of the assets that are part of your trust, ie. they have been titled in the name of your trust “John Doe, Trustee of the John Doe Trust.”

There are two important things to keep in mind about your schedule A. First, it is just a summary of your trust assets. What is critical is that assets you want to be in your trust are indeed titled in the name of your trust. Assume for example that you buy a new home and that the deed to your new home lists your trust as the owner but you fail to get out your estate planning binder to add it to your Schedule A. Is the home “in” your trust? Is the home now a “trust asset”despite not being listed on your Schedule A? Yes, because what matters is how the deed is written, not whether you actually wrote it on your Schedule A.

The second important thing to know about a Schedule A is that although it is just a list, that list can in some circumstances assist in avoiding probate. As an example, suppose your Schedule A lists a particular brokerage account that you intended to title in the name of your trust but somehow forgot to mail in the necessary paperwork to make the change. Is the brokerage account “in” your trust (ie. is it a trust asset?) No, because it has not been properly titled in the name of your trust. In California however, if you have an assets listed on your Schedule A and have not transferred that asset by making the title change, you can file a petition called a Heggstad petition to show the court your intent was to transfer the asset into the trust.

Published on: November 12, 2009

The Poor Economy May Be Reason to Amend Your Estate Plan

by Scott C. Soady

With the recent downturn in the economy, San Diego has been one of the hardest hit with declining property values and unemployment. According to the Feds, the states in a full recession are California, Florida, Arizona, and Nevada. California has reached 11%unemployment and San Diego is in the top five cities for decline in property values. Because of these factors, San Diegans may need to review their estate plan and possibly amend their will or trust.

Suppose your trust leaves a cash bequest to a particular beneficiary, maybe a charity, and then divides the rest of your estate into percentages. When the value of your assets goes down, because of lower real property values or a decline in your investments, that in turn will affect the amount other beneficiaries receive as a percentages. As an example suppose an individual decided to leave $100,000 to his favorite charity and the rest of his estate is to be divided between his four children. The trust was done at a time when the rest of his estate had a value of $1 million. With the problems in the economy, now the estate is only worth $700,000. Instead of each child receiving 1/4 of $1 million, they will be receiving 1/4 of $600,000. Since the cash bequest to the charity comes out of estate before the rest of the estate is divided, the children are now going to have a $100,000 per child reduction. Instead of each child inheriting $250,000, they will only inherit $150,000. The trustor may want to rethink the amount of the cash bequest to charity and amend his trust accordingly.

Another example is where you leave one child your trust assets and other children non-trust assets such as an insurance policy. The amount of the life insurance proceeds are not going to change because of the economy but the trust assets very well may. If your goal is to treat all your children equally, then maybe your trust should be amended.

Published on: November 3, 2009

An Heir is An Heir

by Scott C. Soady

When you die without a will or a trust, you are said to have died “intestate.” The Court in the probate proceeding ,which will have to occur when someone dies”intestate,'” will determine who receives your estate based on California law. So if, for example, you are single with no children, your parents are your heirs and your estate will be divided between your mother and father.

But what about a situation where a father abandons his child at birth, has had no contact with his child, never paid child support, i.e. not really much of a father. Should that type of father inherit his son’s estate when the son dies? You are probably hoping the answer is “no”. Unfortunately the answer is that the father will inherit from the son, no matter what kind of a father he has been.

In a California case called Estate of Shellenbarger, decided by the Second District Court of Appeal in 2008, there were similar facts. The son died intestate (without a will or trust). Since the son was unmarried with no children, his parents are his heirs under California law. The administrator appointed by the Court tried to argue that the father should not receive any inheritance based on fairness, because he had left the mother prior to his son’s birth and never made any child support payments. The Court ruled that intestate succession is purely based on statute and a Court cannot disinherit an heir even on equitable grounds.

Published on: September 24, 2009

What is the Difference between a Life Estate and a Right to Occupancy?

by Scott C. Soady

A life estate is a right to exclusive possession and use of property during one’s lifetime. Thus, when a person(called the “grantor”) gives another individual a “life estate”, the recipient (called the “life tenant”) receives many of the same rights as the owner but only for his or her lifetime. When the life tenant dies, however, the property does not go to the life tenant’s heirs or beneficiaries, it goes to a beneficiary designated by the property owner.

Examples might be a piece of property that you want your children to benefit from during their lifetimes, but once they have passed away, the property will go to charity. Another common example is a widow or a widower who remarries and wants to provide for their spouse during his or her lifetime but wants the family home to go to the children when the spouse dies. Specific conditions can be spelled out in the life estate agreement such as that the life tenant not do anything to diminish the value of the property, keep the property in good repair, pay the taxes, even not remarry.

Life estate can be useful in some areas of estate planning and can be created by a deed or by a will or trust. In addition to giving another individual a life estate interest, you can also give yourself a life estate in property you own. An example of this occurs when a mother transfers her home to a child but retains the right to live there until her death.

Published on: September 3, 2009

Who is Entitled to a Copy of Your Trust?

by Scott C. Soady

One of the advantages of having a revocable living trust is that it is private and not a public record. No one has the right to see the provisions of your trust unless you want them to.

When you transfer your bank accounts into the name of your trust, you frequently will take your trust into the financial institution and show them that you have a trust. This is often done by showing the bank officer the first page and last page of your trust. You can also show or give them a copy of your Certification of Trust which is a document that shows then name of your trust, possibly the trust powers, and the current trustees. The document is notarized and can be used to show the existence of the trust. You do not have to provide any financial institution with a copy of your trust.

Upon your death or the death of your spouse, your trust becomes available to the beneficiaries of the trust or your heirs. California Probate Code Section 16061.5(a) provides:

Published on: August 28, 2009

Leaving Money to Grandchildren

by Scott C. Soady

Many people want to leave their grandchildren something when they pass away. It may be small or it may be significant. There are several ways to do this, some better than others. When you draft your estate plan, you have no way of knowing whether some of your beneficiaries are going to be minors at the time you die. You have to plan for the possibility that some may be minors.

1. Outright Gift. You can simply provide in your will that a dollar amount or a percentage of your estate will go to a grandchild but this leads to problems if the recepient is a minor. Substantial amounts of money being inherited by a minor may cause a court-supervised guardianship of the estate of the minor until he or she is 18. Then at 18, the entire inheritance is handed over to the now adult, but still 18 year old, with no limitations attached.

2. Custodial Accounts. One way you can leave money to minors is in an account under the Uniform Transfer to Minors Act ( a UTMA account). This works well for small amounts of money. The account has a custodian who has the power to withdraw funds for the health, education, and maintenance of the minor. Once the child reaches the age you specify (In California it can be as old as 25), the child has full access to the funds.

Published on: August 15, 2009

New Rules in 2010 Concerning “No Contest” Clauses

by Scott C. Soady

Many wills and trusts include language to deter future disputes or contests over the provisions of the will or trust. These “no contest” clauses typically provide that if someone challenges the validity of a will or trust, they take nothing under the instrument.

As an example, suppose a parent has two daughters and creates a trust leaving her estate equally to her two children. Just before her death, she changes her trust to leave the bulk of her estate to the younger dauhter with whom she lives. If the trust contains a “no contest” clause, the daughter who wants to challenge the validity of the trust as amended, faces a court holding that her objection constitutes a “contest” and therefore, the objecting child takes nothing under the trust.

Beginning in 2010, Probate Code Sections 21300-21322 will be repealed. New Probate Code Section 21310(6) will define a “contest” as one that alleges the validity of an instrument based on either (1) forgery, (2) lack of capacity (3) fraud, duress, or undue influence (4) revocation or (5) disqualification of a beneficiary under Probate Code Sections 6112 or 21350 (care custodians, drafters, etc.)

Published on: August 10, 2009

Revocable Living Trusts in This Economy

by Scott C. Soady

Most people agree we are in the middle of an economic recession in this country. Unemployment is high and the stock market is like a roller coaster. How does the recession affect your need for a trust or affect your exisiting trust you already have?

If you do not have a trust and have assets of over $100,000, you do need a revocable living trust even in this economy, and some people would say, even more so. If you have real property out of state, a trust will avoid probate in both California and the state where the property is located. Many people have young children and need a trust with guardians set up in case something happens to them. Death is inevitable, recession or not, but a trust will enable your estate to be distributed faster and less costly than with a will or with no estate plan at all.

If you already have a trust, the recession may also affect you. In a recession, some investors try to recession-proof their portfolios by switching their IRAs, 401(ks) or other investments into different funds or CDs. Have you remembered to always title new investments in the name of your trust and made up to date beneficiary designations? Changing accounts, sales of real property, refinancing, etc. all increase in times of rescession, leaving open the possibility that assets are not properly titled in the name of the trust.

Published on: July 31, 2009

Avoiding Probate

by Scott C. Soady

Aa you have learned from the recent series of blogs on probate, if you can avoid a probate after your death, your heirs will have an easier time settling your estate.

The best way to avoid probate is to have a revocable living trust into which you transfer all of your assets to yourself as the trustee during your lifetime. Upon your death, the successor trustee you have chosen will have immediate authority to administer your trust without a probate. It is critical however that you in fact transfer your assets into your trust by deed, changing title to accounts, etc. Other advantages of a trust are privacy and that if properly drafted, the trust will also have provisions for someone to manage your assets if you become unable to do that for yourself.

Other ways to hold title to avoid probate are: