LIVING TRUSTS

Published on: June 29, 2009

Settling Michael Jackson’s Estate Could Be a Real Life “Thriller”

Newspapers and magazines are already commenting that Michael Jackson’s estate will be a real nightmare. No one seems to know at this point whether Jackson had a will or a trust. Some people think there is no way he would have failed to provide for his children. In the absence of a will or a trust, his children would inherit the estate equally.

Whether Jackson created an estate plan or not, his estate will have to be settled, either in the probate court, or through trust administration. There are many creditors already lining up to be included. Although Jackson sold millions of records, he reportedly was in serious debt, perhaps as much as $400 million.

One of the assets in his estate that is going to be fascinating is the publishing rights Jackson had to millions of songs. Jackson outbid Sir Paul McCartney for a 50% interest in a music publishing catalog that includes rights to the Beatles hits as well as publishing rights to other hits by major artists, Jackson apparently paid $48 million for the rights, now estimated to be worth $500 million.

Published on: June 27, 2009

Challenging Wills or Trusts

by Scott C. Soady

Part of our estate planning caseload at Law Office of Scott C. Soady, A Professional Corporation are cases in which a will or a trust is being questioned or challenged. Typical factual scenarios are where an heir or a beneficiary has been disinherited or their share reduced because of “death bed” changes which may have resulted from undue influence, fraud, or duress. Most wills or trusts contain a clause known as a “no contest clause.” “No contest” clauses are commonly found in wills and trusts to discourage someone from challenging the will or trust. Typically, the language is that if anyone contests the will or trust, that individual will take nothing.

Existing law however, allows a beneficiary or other individual to file a petition with the court (called a Safe Harbor petition) asking the court to determine whether a particular challenge fits within the definition of a “contest.” If the court rules that it doesn’t constitute a contest, then the will or trust can be challenged in spite of the “no contest” clause.

Last Year the California legislature passed a bill which was signed by Governor Schwarzenegger that will change the law regarding “no contest” clauses. Under the new law which will take effect in January 2010, the applicability of the “no contest” clauses will be limited to specific circumstances. The new law will eliminate Safe Harbor petitions and will also provide that a “no contest” clause will only be enforceable to defeat a will or a trust contest if brought without probable cause.

Published on: June 16, 2009

Parents & Grandparents – Have You Considered a Special Needs Trust

by Scott C. Soady

Many parents and grandparents don’t realize that a child, grandchild, or other beneficiary with a disability complicates an estate plan. If you have such a loved one you want to provide for in your estate plan, you need an appropriate trust even more so than someone without a disabled beneficiary in the picture. Here are some of the points often overlooked in planning for a special needs beneficiary:

Outright distributions to a special needs child or adult will likely make the beneficiary ineligible for continued SSI or Medi-Cal benefits. On the other hand, leaving such a beneficiary out of your will or trust may not be something you feel comfortable with and disinheriting that person could leave the beneficiary with total reliance on such benefits. Sometimes people think they will leave property or assets to another family member with the understanding that he or she will provide for the disabled beneficiary. This approach is unwise as the family member could not follow through ( it happens), die, or run into financial difficulty.

The way around the issue is to create a third party special needs trust as part of your estate plan. If you already have a trust, a stand-alone special needs trust can be drafted. If you haven’t created a trust yet, a special needs trust can be incorporated into yours. The trust can provide distributions for the beneficiary’s special needs, such as medical care not covered by public benefits, computers, TV, vacations, and other items or activities to enhance the beneficiary’s life. With such a trust, the beneficiary is able to continue eligibility for government benefits and use his or her inheritance to supplement those benefits.

Published on: June 11, 2009

What Assets Do Not Go Through Probate?

by Scott C. Soady

If you have a will and not a trust, when you die your estate will have to go through probate. In general this means that all the property that the deceased owned at the time of death such as real property, personal property, bank accounts, investment accounts, etc. will be part of the probate estate. However there are some exceptions. You may have in your estate some assets that do not go through probate in California. These are some of them:

1. Property held in joint tenancy. An example might be a home you own with your spouse with a “right of survivorship.” Sometimes people own their cars in joint tenancy with other people or a bank account in joint tenancy. When a joint tenant dies, the other joint tenant(s) inherit the property without the probate process. Although assets held in joint tenancy avoid probate, holding title in joint tenancy can cause other problems such as the potential loss of a full step-up in basis which can result in capital gains. Another problem which can result when you own something in joint tenancy is that creditors of the other joint tenant may be able to enforce a judgment against the property.

2. Payable on Death Accounts (or POD accounts). This is a type of account where you choose a beneficiary who will receive the account upon your death. These accounts pass to the beneficiary without probate.

Published on: June 4, 2009

Do Living Trusts Protect Your Assets From Creditors?

by Scott C. Soady

We frequently get calls from prospective clients wanting to know if creating a trust will protect their assets from creditors or lawsuits. Unfortunately, they do not.

A revocable living trust is a legal arrangement whereby you hold your assets in trust to be used and managed until your death when they will be distributed to someone else. You can add assets or remove assets from your trust at any time, even revoke the trust completely and put them back into your name individually. Since you have control of your assets, creditors can reach those assets to collect on a debt.

There are some irrevocable trusts that can remove assets from your control but these cannot be revoked, hence they should be created with advice from an experienced estate planning attorney and possibly your financial advisor.

Published on: May 10, 2009

Some “No No’s Once Your Trust is in Place

by Scott C. Soady

At Law Office of Scott C. Soady, A Professional Corporation we see trusts everyday that are drafted by other estate planning lawyers in San Diego or even by our own firm that cause some concern. Once your trust is drafted, it is intended to be reviewed periodically and also there are some things you need to aware of.

Not transferring into your trust all of your assets that should be in the trust. Depending on your attorney and what arrangements you make concerning transfer of assets into the trust, some transfers of assets require an affirmative action on your part. For example, to transfer your accounts into the name of your trust, you often have to visit the bank and fill out new signature cards. If you forget to do this, the bank account will not be in the trust at the time of your death, causing problems for your heirs. As you acquire new assets or change the form of the ones you have, you need to remember to title those new or changed assets into your trust. Assets that are left out, with some exceptions, will require probate and that is what you were trying to avoid in creating the trust in the first place.

Writing on your trust, crossing out words, or writing in the margins. We often have clients come into the office for a review of their trust or for some other service and find that their trust document has words crossed out or writings in the margins or highlighting. Please remember that a trust is a notarized document and it can only be changed by another document that is notarized. You cannot change your trust by crossing out language and adding the changes with your signature; it has to be formally amended. Also if we are going to petition the Court for some reason concerning your trust, a clean copy of the original trust will have to be filed.

Published on: May 4, 2009

What is the meaning of the term “capacity” in California?

by Scott C. Soady

What is the meaning of the term “capacity” in California?

Many people, particularly estate planning lawyers toss the term “capacity” out as though everyone knows what the term means. Often you hear people talk about someone “losing capacity” in the sense of not being able to make a will or trust or take care of their finances. What exactly does the term “capacity” mean in the context of making a will or a trust?

The California Probate Code provides that a person is not “mentally competent”to make at will if either of the following is true:

Published on: March 29, 2009

Procrastination Has Its Problems

by Scott C. Soady

We know that many Americans procrastinate about getting a will or a trust done. Especially in this economy where people have a lot of challenges, an estate plan, even if desired, sometimes doesn’t work itself up to the top of one’s To Do List. What happens if you procrastinate about getting an estate plan?

Probate – Without a trust or a will, your estate will wind up in the probate court. Statutory fees will have to be paid to the probate attorney and the administrator of your estate. Probate is not private – anyone can view probate records – and the distributions to your heirs can be delayed for as much as a year and in some cases, longer.

Without a will or a trust, your surviving spouse may not inherit your entire estate. Your spouse will inherit all the community property but will only get 1/2 to 1/3 of your separate property. The remaining property will go to the children.

Published on: March 22, 2009

Can Killers Inherit from Their Victims?

by Scott C. Soady

Have you ever wondered whether someone who murders another person can inherit from their estate? In years past, there have been several California cases where children have murdered their parents, sometimes for money, as was alleged in the famous Menendez case in Los Angeles. Two brothers, Eric and Lyle Menendez, were tried and convicted of murdering their parents in 1989 to inherit what they thought was a $14 million estate. As it turned out, after taxes, loans, and costs of defense, they each would have inherited only about $ 2 million each. They were prevented from inheriting their parents’ estate.

The California Probate Code Section 250 has a section that provides that a person who “feloniously and intentionally kills the decedent” is not entitled to “any property, interest, or benefit under a will of the decedent or a trust…” This would also include life insurance proceeds or assets left to the killer as a designated beneficiary. You may remember Scott Peterson who was convicted of killing his wife. He was prevented from receiving benefits from his wife’s insurance policy.

All states in this country have similar laws to prevent someone who kills another from inheriting from the victim of their crime. In addition many states have adopted laws to make it difficult for convicted killers to sell their story and keep the money for themselves. These so-called “Son of Sam” laws came from the case where serial killer David Berkowitz, nicknamed the Son of Sam, was planning to profit from the sale of his story. California passed a “Son of Sam” law in 1986 prohibiting felons from profiting from their crimes. This law was struck down in 2002 as being unconstitutional. Today “Son of Sam” laws are sometimes put into plea bargains to provide that any profits from book deal or movies will go to the U. S. Treasury. Another remedy for victims is that they can sue their perpetrators in civil court, as in the O.J.Simpson case, and obtain a judgment which would be satisfied by book and movie profits.

Published on: March 10, 2009

Update, Update, Update Your Estate Plan!

by Scott C. Soady

Accidental disinheritance is a growing problem, not only in San Diego, but across the country. We have seen it in the cases of Anna Nicole Smith and Heath Ledger. Failure to update estate planning documents or beneficiary designations can cause unintended disinheritance or unequal distributions that may not have been intended.

One of the ways people accidentally cause a disinheritance is in a stepparent situation. As an example, suppose a man has a will he created when married to the mother of his children. After she dies, he remarries and writes a new will leaving everything to his new wife. When he dies, the new wife inherits everything and then leaves her estate to her own children. The husband’s children (her stepchildren) are disinherited, which was probably not the father’s intent. The way to avoid this was to have a trust set up with the new wife which could have provided that his wife had the use of the assets during her lifetime but upon her death, the husband’s children participated in the distributions. This is a situation where an experienced estate planning lawyer would have been worth the expense to draft an appropriate will or trust to take into consideration possible future scenarios.

Another way that a failure to update can cause difficulties is where a child is born after the estate plan is created and the child has special needs. A trust, if drafted correctly, usually will provide for after born children without the necessity to update the trust, however, if a child born after the trust is created has special needs and is on public assistance, a special needs trust needs to be prepared so if the parents die, the child does not receive his inheritance outright and lose his public assistance.