TRUST ADMINISTRATION

Published on: March 17, 2009

Families Need to Greive Before Tackling Estate Issues

Sometimes we get calls within a day or two of a loved one’s passing away by family members who wonder what they should do. The first thing that should be done is to handle the bereavement process. Spend time with family and friends and begin the grieving process before anything else.

There are many resources on line and in San Diego for information on the grieving process.

The National Hospice and Palliative Care Organization is the largest nonprofit organization representing hospice and palliative care programs. In San Diego we have the Elizabeth Hospice, San Diego Hospice, and Hospice by the Sea to name just a few. For people dealing with the death of a child there is the Empty Cradle and the Jenna Druck Foundation.

Published on: March 12, 2009

Extension for Filing and Paying Tax Returns

by Scott C. Soady

Some people need extra time to file a personal tax return or an estate tax return. On your personal income taxes, you can apply for an automatic extension to file but it doesn’t extend the time to pay. You will have to pay a .5% per month penalty for late payment.

With the payment of estate taxes, you can also apply to receive a 6 month extension. The extension provided for in IRS Form 4768 is automatic. You will automatically receive an extension to file for 6 months however be aware that an extension of time to file is not an extension of time to pay the taxes. An extension of time to pay is discretionary.

One executor and trustee of an estate found this out the hard way. In a court case entitled Baccei v. United States, a trustee of a revocable living trust hired an accountant to prepare the Federal estate tax return. The accountant filed Form 4768 requesting a 6 month extension of time to file the return. Part of the form contains a section for an explanation as to why the estate needs more time to pay the tax and the number of months requested, up to 12 months. The accountant did not fill out that part of the form. Within 6 months, the accountant filed the return and paid the estate tax. The IRS then assessed a late penalty on the estate tax paid which had been approximately $1 ½ million. The Trustee appealed.

Published on: February 9, 2009

Duties of a Trustee in San Diego

by Scott C. Soady

Many people in San Diego are in the position of choosing a successor trustee for their living trust or they may be beneficiaries of a trust and wonder if the trustee is managing or distributing their inheritances properly. Generally the trustee must administer the trust according to the terms of the trust and the California Probate Code. Here are some of the duties of a trustee of an irrevocable trust in California.

Duty of Loyalty. The trustee must administer the trust in the best interest of the beneficiaries, not using the power to the detriment of any beneficiary.

Duty of Impartiality. Similarly, the trustee must treat all beneficiaries the same, not favor one over another or if the trustee is also a beneficiary, giving himself or herself favor.

Published on: January 12, 2009

Trust Administration in San Diego

by Scott C. Soady

Living trusts save beneficiaries thousands of dollars in probate fees, however, upon the death of the Trustor, there are still steps that need to be taken by the Successor Trustee. These steps are called trust administration and often require some assistance from an experienced attorney. If these actions are not taken or done incorrectly, the Successor Trustee may be held liable to the beneficiaries.

The California Probate Code requires notification by the Successor Trustee to the beneficiaries and heirs of the person who has died. A copy of the will must be filed with the County Clerk. Notices should be sent to the Dept. of Health Services to determine if the person received Medi-Cal benefits as there may be a lien against the estate for reimbursement of those benefits. A similar notice of death should be sent to the Social Security Admiistration, Veterans Administration (if applicable) and the credit bureaus. Creditors may need to be dealt with. The issue of estate taxes needs to be considered.

Trust assets need to be inventoried and valued as of the date of death and decisions made as to how the assets will be distributed to the beneficiaries. Will assets be liquidated to provide cash to the beneficiaries or will the assets themselves be divided up in a manner which fulfills the trust’s provisions?

Published on: December 26, 2008

Valuable Information to Protect Your Deceased Loved One From Identity Theft

by Scott C. Soady

Earlier this month we posted a blog about identity theft during the hollidays. Malls in North County, South Bay, Carlsbad, and Mission Valley are targets for pick pockets and thieves who look to steal purses. But did you know that even deceased persons can be victims of identity theft? The deceased are easy targets because sometimes it takes weeks or months and in some cases years for financial institutions to find out about a death. The identity of a deceased person can be stolen in a variety of ways. Some identity thieves watch the obituaries, look up death certificates, or obtain private information from health care providers, unknowing relatives, or internet genealogy web sites.

Back in 2006 in Kentucky a financial planner used the confidential data of 160 deceased persons to acquire 700 credit cards from financial institutions and scammed nearly $2 million over a three year period

Although the deceased person doesn’t have to be concerned with his or her credit rating, identity theft can cause emotional distress for the family. Identity Theft Resource Center has valuable information about how to protect yourself and your deceased loved one from identity theft. They also have an information sheet with steps to take to decrease the risk of identity theft such as notifying the credit bureaus to put a “deceased” notation in their file, obtaining a copy of the decedent’s credit report, and a list of agencies and companies to notify of the death. Sample letters can be found at the California Office of Privacy Protection.

Published on: November 10, 2008

What to Do When the First Spouse Passes Away?

by Scott C. Soady

There are many different types of trusts which San Diego couples may create as the cornerstone of their estate plan. Prior to 2000 when the exemption for estate taxes was $650,000 many couples had A/B trusts prepared. These were also called Bypass Trusts, Marital Trusts, or Exemption Trusts. These types of trusts call for the initial trust to split into two or more trusts after the death of the first spouse in order to reduce or eliminate the federal estate tax. Today many couples still have this type of trust. Couples with children from prior relationships also may have this type of trust which requires a split or division in trust assets after the first death.

Couples may also have a disclaimer trust which requires the surviving spouse to disclaim assets within nine months of death in order to take advantage of the federal estate tax exemption for couples. There are also so-called option trusts which place a duty on the surviving spouse to value the estate after the first death and only split the trust into sub trusts if necessary to take advantage of the federal estate tax exemption. All of these types of trusts require that after the first death, some steps be taken to comply with California law, preserve the federal estate tax exemption, and change title to assets. This is called trust administration.

If the trust is one which requires a division into two or more sub trusts, the assets in the estate need to be valued as of the date of the first death, then the assets allocated between two or more trusts, and new deeds prepared for real property. If the original trust is not divided at all after the first death or the assets allocated improperly, tax benefits can be lost. Also there may be financial losses to the children of the couple or other beneficiaries. Sometimes in the aftermath of a spouse passing away, these details may understandably be overlooked.

Published on: July 30, 2008

North San Diego County – Will and Trust Litigation

by Scott C. Soady

Even when a person dies with a will or a trust, there can be disputes that result in a will contest or trust litigation. An individual may feel he or she should have been a beneficiary under a will or a trust. Sometimes a will has been changed and beneficiaries under the original will feel there has some impropriety surrounding the execution of the subsequent will. Sometimes beneficiaries may be dissatisfied with the accounting of the assets in the estate. When these types of issues occur, it may become necessary to seek the assistance of the court to resolve these issues. Common grounds for contesting a will are such things as claims of undue influence, lack of mental capacity, fraud, or an invalid codicil (amendment).

With a trust, individuals who are beneficiaries or think they should be a beneficiary may dispute the trust. Issues can arise such as the validity of the trust or amendments, the administration of the trust, or conduct of the trustee. Sometimes trustees have to be removed for misconduct or impropriety or it may be the case that beneficiaries have to initiate litigation to receive a fair distribution.

Handling a will or trust litigation matter requires special experience. If you have concerns about a will or a trust or believe you should have inherited from one, the experienced estate planning lawyers at Law Office of Scott C. Soady, A Professional Corporation can assist you. Call or e mail us for a complimentary, confidential in-house consultation.

Published on: October 1, 2002

San Diego Bank Account Distribution Post Death

by Scott C. Soady

An elderly doctor and his daughter opened a joint bank account, the money in which would go to the surviving account holder if the other one died. This is a case of the right of survivorship and should have been part of a revocable living trust and then would proceed by trust administration. Nine years later, when the doctor was in declining health, his wife asked to be added to the account so that she could pay bills. Based on the signatures of the doctor and his wife, but not the daughter, the bank added the wife to the account. Over a one-month period, the wife then wrote many checks on the account, totaling over $100,000. The biggest check, for $75,000, was written, cashed, and deposited to the wife’s own account on the very day her husband died.

The daughter sued the bank, claiming it was liable to her for recognizing a new party to the joint account without the consent of all parties to the account. A state supreme court sided with the bank. First, the documents that comprised the contract between the bank and the account holders included a statement that each owner was the agent of any other owners for purposes of endorsements, deposits, withdrawals, and conducting business for the account. This language was broad enough to give the doctor power to add his wife as a new party to the account without his daughter’s knowledge or consent. Second, a statute on joint accounts similarly made each party to an account the agent for other account holders, although the statute was silent on the method for adding a new party to an account. The bank had not breached its contract when it recognized the doctor’s wife as a new party to the account based solely on the doctor’s signature.

This decision highlights the pitfalls that can accompany joint bank accounts. Allowing each party to a joint account to exercise full authority over the account is flexible and convenient, but the cost of these advantages is loss of control. The exposure to this risk is widespread, as joint account contracts typically have language like that used in this case.