Published on:

The estate tax-also known as the “death tax”-is often misunderstood. Despite its prominent place in the political debate over tax policies, the estate tax only affects a small number of estates each year. According to Internal Revenue Service records, there were 4,588 estate tax returns filed nationwide in 2011, including 806 estates in California. That represents an infinitesimal fraction of the estimated 233,000 annual deaths in the state.

Nonetheless, it’s still useful to understand when and how the estate tax applies. Unlike the federal income tax we’re all familiar with, the estate tax is a levy against the property of a deceased individual. The assessment is based on the gross estate of the decedent’s property as of the day of his or her death. (If the decedent’s property earned any income after death, a separate income tax return must be filed by the estate.) The executor or personal representative of the decedent’s estate is responsible for assessing the date-of-death value of all property and, if necessary, reporting it on the federal estate tax return.

Probate Estate vs. Gross Estate

Published on:

Spouses receive a special exemption under federal estate tax law known as the marital deduction. When the first spouse dies, any portion of his or her estate that passes to the surviving spouse is not subject to estate tax. No tax is assessed until the second spouse dies.

The marital deduction does not apply, however, when the surviving spouse is not a U.S. citizen. Any property left to a non-citizen spouse is subject to the estate tax. For estates of persons who die in 2013, that’s a maximum tax rate of 40% on gross assets exceeding $5.25 million.

If either or both spouses are non-citizens, there are two options to avoid estate taxes upon the first spouse’s death. The non-citizen spouse can obtain U.S. citizenship, making him or her eligible for the marital deduction. Alternatively, the spouse that plans to leave property to a non-citizen spouse may create a qualified domestic trust (or QDOT) as part of his or her estate plan. If both citizens are non-spouses residing in the United States, each spouse may create a QDOT for the benefit of the other.

Published on:

In addition to a Last Will and Testament or Living Trust, an often overlooked estate planning tool is the life estate. A life estate is like a trust except that it’s created by executing a deed giving a person the right to use a particular piece of land for life. After that person’s death, ownership automatically reverts to one or more remaindermen, the heirs specified in the life estate.

As an example, let’s say you own your house and wish to leave it to your only daughter upon your death. You might create a life estate entitling you to continue living in the house until your death, at which point your daughter inherits as remainderman. Unlike leaving the house to your daughter through a Last Will and Testament, under a life estate the property never passes into probate, because your ownership terminates at the moment of your death. In this respect a life estate functions much like a trust-property passes to your designated heirs outside of probate.

As the holder of a life estate, you would continue to exercise full ownership of the house during your lifetime. In theory you could even sell the house, provided the buyer surrenders the property to your daughter upon your death. And just like a tenant of a rental property, you also cannot take any action that might devalue the property or prevent the remaindermen from later enjoying full use of the property.

Published on:

A last will and testament is not carved into stone. As you experience major life events, you will likely need to revise or update your will many times. If you get married, you’ll want to name your spouse as an executor or beneficiary. Conversely, if you get divorced (or you outlive your spouse) you may want to remove your former spouse from your will. You may have additional children after you sign your will or come into a specific item of property–even a business–that you wish to leave to a specific person not mentioned in your original will. All of these cases require a means of changing your existing will to reflect new circumstances.

The traditional method for amending a will is a codicil. This is a written amendment executed in much the same form as the original will. For instance, the “First Codicil to the Last Will and Testament of Mary Smith” might delete a specific bequest to a sister whom Mary is no longer on speaking terms with. Mary would sign a codicil noting the deletion while reaffirming all other provisions of her original will. And like the will, Mary must sign the codicil in the presence of two witnesses who can attest she has the capacity to execute such a document. The will and the codicil then effectively become one document.

In theory, Mary could execute as many codicils as she wanted, changing the terms of her will every year or even every month. But she can just as easily skip the codicil and sign a new will.

Published on:

Charitable giving is a common feature of many estate plans. In addition to providing for family, individuals may wish to support their favorite charitable organizations or causes by making specific bequests in their will or trust. In some cases, a person may create a charitable lead trust or charitable remainder trust to ensure his or her generosity continues to yield benefits for years, even decades, after death. But whatever form you adopt for charitable giving after you’re gone, it’s important to make your intentions known in writing. Ambiguity over promised donations can lead to significant litigation.

The Difficulty of Proving Oral Promises to Give

Consider the case of Roland Arnall. The son of Eastern European Jews who fled Europe during the Second World War, Arnall built a fortune as the owner of Ameriquest, at one time the largest holder of sub-prime mortgages in the United States. Arnall’s estimated fortune was $1.5 billion, and his generous donations to the Republican Party led President George W. Bush to name him ambassador to the Netherlands in 2005.

Published on:

In 1976 the Supreme Court of California recognized that contracts arising from non-marital domestic relationships are enforceable even if they don’t fall within the community property laws governing traditional marriage. This principle extends to cases where one unmarried partner promises to provide for the other in his or her estate plan. A “contract to make a will” is valid under a 2000 amendment to the California Probate Code, even if the agreement is only made orally, provided there is clear and convincing evidence of the deceased person’s intentions.

Note that contracts to make a will are not limited to domestic partners. For instance, a father might promise to leave part of his estate to a daughter if she moves in with him. If she does so and the father later dies without making a will, the daughter could pursue a breach of contract claim against his estate.

In a case where one unmarried partner dies without fulfilling an oral contract to make a will for the benefit of the other, the survivor may face resistance from the deceased person’s family, which can lead to costly litigation. The laws governing these types of cases are complicated in California, as demonstrated by a recent decision by the state’s court of appeals.

Published on:

A living trust can be an excellent estate planning tool. The benefit of a trust is that assets can pass directly to your chosen beneficiaries without the need for probate. But if your wishes change during your lifetime, it’s important to amend your trust in a timely manner and ensure that any assets previously placed in trust are properly registered. Never assume that a bank or other institution managing your asset is aware of changes to your trust or estate plan.

An unpublished California appeals court decision from last year shows what can happen when a trust amendment is not properly administered. The case involved two trusts established by Marjorie Fae Howard. Howard created her first living trust in 1992 with herself as trustee and her son, Lawrence Howard, as successor trustee upon her death. The trust provided for an equal distribution of Howard’s assets between her three children, including Lawrence.

Subsequently, Marjorie and Lawrence Howard had a falling out. In 2002 she removed his name from a number of assets jointly registered in their names, including her automobile and safe deposit box. By November 2002, Marjorie Howard retained an estate planning attorney to prepare a new living trust to replace the 1992 trust. The 2002 trust named another of Marjorie’s sons, William Howard, as successor trustee. Whereas the 1992 trust provided for an equal distribution between the three children, Marjorie now wished to give William and her third son, Joe, $125,000 upfront before distributing any remainder equally among all three sons.

Published on:

If you’ve just moved to the San Diego area from another state, it’s a good idea to consult with a California estate planning lawyer to revise your Last Will and Testament. You should do the same if you’re leaving for another state. Every state has its own probate laws that can affect your estate differently. And if you own property in more than one state, it may become necessary for your executor to open an ancillary estate, which can significantly add to the costs of probate.

The most common reason for an ancillary probate is a deceased person owns real estate outside of his or her home state. For instance, let’s say you live in California and own a house here, plus you own a vacation home in Arizona. After your death, your executor will open a primary estate in California to dispose of your home and personal property here, and an ancillary estate in Arizona just to do deal with the vacation home.

Personal Property May Require Separate Probate Proceeding

Published on:

When an elderly parent becomes unable to care for himself, there may arise serious disagreements among children and other family members over the best course of action. Careful estate planning on the parent’s part before he or she becomes unable to express his wishes is always best. Failure to plan for such circumstances can lead to lengthy, costly and emotionally divisive litigation.

California law provides two main avenues for probate court intervention in the affairs of adults who no longer have the capacity to make decisions. The first thing a court can do is name a conservator of the estate, someone to oversee the person’s financial affairs, pay their bills, sell their property, and so forth. A related but separate act is the appointment of a conservator of the person, who oversees the living conditions and medical care of the person. Both conservatorships may be combined in a single person but require separate legal proceedings.

Conservatorships Don’t Always Settle Issues of Care

Published on:

Estate planning is more than just signing a last will and testament. It entails making provision for all of your assets through various legal instruments. In many cases, isolated estate planning events take place over a period several years, even decades, so that different laws may be applicable to the disposition of certain assets. Failure to regularly update your plans can prove costly after your death.

Divorce, Remarriage and the Meaning of “Net Assets”

Last year a state appeals court in San Diego had to sort out one such mess. The case was not officially published, and so it out cannot be relied upon as a statement of the law. However, the discussion in the opinion is a helpful way to understand the legal issues at play.

Contact Information