Published on:

An important tool of California estate planning is the power of appointment. A person making a will (a testator) can name a donee–the person who will exercise the power of appointment–to dispose of the testator’s property at a future date. For example, John Smith can make a power of appointment designating his brother, Phil Smith, to dispose of his book collection after his death. John can leave it up to Phil to decide who should get the books, or he could restrict the power by saying, for instance, that the books should be divided among Phil’s children as Phil sees fit.

The power of appointment is governed under California law and federal tax regulations. According to IRS rules, if the testator makes a “general” power of appointment–John leaves his books to Phil for him to distribute as he wishes–then for federal estate tax purposes, the books are considered the property of Phil and not John’s estate. Thus, the value of the books would not be factored into any estate tax levied against John’s estate.

In order for a general power of appointment to be general, however, the person exercising the power must have the authority to use the property himself. In other words, if Phil can keep some or all of the books for himself (or his estate, or to pay off his creditors after his death), then John has executed a general power of appointment. It doesn’t matter whether Phil ultimately keeps or uses the books himself, only that he has the legal right to do so.

Published on:

You often read news stories (or see fictional dramas) where aggravated family members “contest” the will of a relative. But can anyone contest a will? In California the established law is that a person cannot contest a will unless he or she is an “interested person” in the estate of the deceased.

So what constitutes an interested person?

Interested persons include those named as beneficiaries under the will and those who would stand to inherit if there is no will (or the purported will is declared invalid). Members of the former group are legatees while the latter are heirs. Since a valid will normally controls the distribution of a deceased person’s property, heirs may be excluded from inheriting altogether. Conversely, if a will is successfully contested and declared invalid, any legatees (who are not also heirs) may lose their claim to an estate.

Posted in:
Published on:
Updated:
Published on:

When you make a Last Will and Testament, California law normally requires you sign it in the presence of at least two witnesses, who must also sign the will. It’s not necessary for the witnesses to read the will or understand its contents, only that you declare the document that you are signing to be your Last Will and Testament. A will that is not properly witnesses may be contested or challenged in court by your heirs.

But that’s not to say that a court will simply throw out your will if there aren’t two witnesses. Just recently a California appeals court considered a case where a will had only one witness. The deceased, Norminel Reese, had previously given his estate planning lawyer handwritten instructions on how he wished to dispose of his assets after his death. The attorney prepared a will that was then signed by Reese in the presence of a single witness, his girlfriend at the time. She was not a beneficiary under the will.

A Contested Will Divides Siblings

Posted in:
Published on:
Updated:
Published on:

While the status of same-sex marriage in California remains pending before the United States Supreme Court, domestic partnerships remain a legal option for any two adults–regardless of gender–who wish to register their relationship with the state. California law affords registered domestic partners the same “rights, protections, and benefits” as spouses. And as one recent California case demonstrates, courts will look at domestic partnership agreements in much the same way as premarital or prenuptial agreements.

However, there is still some confusion about how different relationship status may affect legal issues, such as probate matters.

In December 2012 a California Court of Appeal panel in San Francisco rejected an appeal brought by Johnlang Konou against the Estate of Philip Timothy Wilson. Konou and the late Dr. Wilson had registered as domestic partners in California in 2006. In mid-2008 when same-sex marriage was legal in the state–before the passage of Proposition 8–Konou and Wilson married. Wilson committed suicide in November 2008, three days after Proposition 8 passed.

Published on:

If during the estate planning process the wellbeing of your furry, four-legged family member is in the forefront of your mind, a pet trust could be your best option. These trusts can provide the peace of mind that the care and costs for Fido are squared away in the event that you are no longer there to provide for his needs.

California is one of a group of states that allows pet owners to create a trust for the costs and care of their pet animals. This law allows a pet owner to plan for the continued care of their animal family members in the event that the pet owner becomes unable to do so. If you are concerned about the future costs and care for your pet, setting up a pet trust, pursuant to California’s pet trust statute provides a way for you to legally leave your pet money in trust and plan for your pet’s care during the remaining life of your pet.

Famous Pet Trusts

Published on:

The end of 2012 was filled with legislative and fiscal uncertainty. Amid the fiscal cliff discussions loomed year end changes in federal tax laws and the lingering effects of those changes on estate planning for coming years. Specifically, many were concerned about the gift and estate tax exemption expiration, and this created a mad rush for many to quickly draft and execute wealth transfers. But, now that the dust has somewhat settled, should you go back and review those 2012 transfers? It may be a good idea.

What Happened at the End of 2012

The lifetime gift tax exemption of $5.12 million with a rate of 35% was in effect until the end of 2012 . However, many worried that starting in 2013 the lifetime gift tax exemption would go down to $1 million dollars with a rate increasing to 55%. As the change loomed at the end of 2012, many individuals in the last part of the year scrambled to take advantage of the higher gift tax exemption before its expiration. Many transferred wealth to children in order to avoid losing large chunks of it to Uncle Sam in later years.

Published on:

One of the least appreciated benefits of having professional assistance with things like estate planning and long-term finances is having an extra set of eyes watching for irregularities. After all, the world is a busy place, and it is easy to get overwhelmed by confusing paperwork issues. Many people allow mail related to bank accounts, insurance, or retirement savings to pile up, assuming that most of the details are not time-sensitive.

But sometimes this casual neglect may lead to serious damage. That is especially true when outside support, like legal professionals, are not involved in these affairs to catch potential problems. The Retirement Blog recently shared one such story where a man lost thousands of dollars because of his failure to keep up-to-date on his retirement account transactions.

Bitter Divorce & Retirement

Published on:

Jenni Rivera was not a household name in most parts of the United States. But the singer, writer, and Telumundo star was known to almost everyone in Mexico. Had things gone differently, she may have gained a following in the United States as well, because she was set to appear in a new ABC television show. Tragically, it was not meant to be, as Rivera died in early December in a Mexican plane crash.

Rivera was only 43 years old at the time of her death, leaving behind five children–the oldest of whom was 28 years old. As a result of her success in the entertainment industry, it is reported that she left behind an estate valued at nearly $25 million.

No Planning?

Posted in:
Published on:
Updated:
Published on:

If you have gone to the gym this week, chances are it was busier than at any other point in the year. It’s the same every January, as the start to the new year comes with a rush of neighbors committed to starting things off right. Losing weight and getting in shape are just one of an endless list of resolutions that residents throughout San Diego make each and every year.

If you have yet to finalize your goals for 2013–and are looking for something a bit outside the box–then consider putting your long-term plans into place. In reality, conduct estate planning, letting family know your medical wishes, and preparing for possible long-term care are not only critical goals for yourself but also your loved ones. There are few things harder than grappling with uncertain legal and ethical concerns in the aftermath of a family member’s sudden illness or death. One of the greatest gifts one can give is taking the matter out of their hands and making decisions as straightforward as possible.

Along the same lines, an editorial from the LA Times recently tried to convince community members to make 2013 the year they finally took care of this often overlooked task. In particular, the editorial refers to the need to have advance directives so that family members are not put in the awful bind of making end-of-life decisions without a clear understanding of their loved one’s wishes.

Published on:

Celebrity estate planning and inheritance news often provides a helpful way to discuss basic topics that are applicable to all community members–even those without great wealth. At the end of the day, many of the same principles about proper planning apply to everyone, no matter what their situation in life.

One of the more high-profile celebrity estate planning stories to make headlines in recent years is that of Huguette Clark. Ms. Clark was the heir to a large copper and railroad fortune. She inherited most of the funds from her father, who is known as the founder of Las Vegas. Ms. Clark was an incredibly private individual, living most of the last decades of her life in a hospital room–even though she was well enough to not need medical care. She passed away in May of 2011 at the age of 104. However, even though it has been over a year and a half since her passing, the details of her inheritance are not entirely resolved.

She had no spouse or children but did have a network of extended family. Though if she was at all close with anyone in her family remains unclear.

Contact Information